Enlightenment thinking essays

Enlightenment thinking essays The two documents that define Enlightenment thinking, a completely new way of thinking, are the Declaration of Independence and the Declaration of the Rights of Man. These two documents were written fifteen years apart, but spoke of the divine right of individuals, and these rights took precedence over government systems. This was a completely different concept than that that of the pre-Enlightenment era. The previous eras gave power and control to the minority, the wealthy and those of royal blood. The age of Enlightenment started an avalanche of questions and rethinking of the commonly held beliefs. As it gained a hold on the people, they began to see themselves as having rights, not just the elite. This philosophy stated that all individuals have God given rights, and the purpose of governments was to protect those rights. This was a complete shift in thinking. No longer were the kings and monarchs the all wise and set above the individual, but rights of each individual held equal importance. The Declaration of Independence stated these rights, and influenced other countries coming out of revolutions. This was the first time in history a country based its government and constitution on the freedom and rights of the citizen. In France, fifteen years later, Marquise de Lafayette wrote the Declaration of the Rights of Man. In the aftermath of the French Revolution, after society and been thrown into anarchy, the French representatives of the National Assembly had to decide what direction the government would take. This document officially declared the new order of France, based on what had happened in America. Marquise de Lafayette, a veteran of the American Revolution wrote their document, he was so deeply influenced that he emphasized those liberties to bring France out of anarchy. He based the document on the natural law, as taught during the Enlightenment. They proclaimed that God gave all men ce...

Free Essays on Legal Brief- Korematsu

1. Korematsu v. United States, (1944); pg. 638, briefed 1/23/96 2. Facts: Shortly after the bombing of Pearl Harbor, the president issued an order allowing the military commanders to exclude persons of Japanese ancestry from areas identified as military areas. 3. Procedural Posture: Korematsu was convicted of violating the exclusionary laws. 4. Issue: Whether classification and exclusion based on Japanese ancestry during the WWII was a violation of equal protection. 5. Holding: No. 6. Majority Reasoning: All legal restrictions that curtail the civil rights of a single racial group are immediately suspect, triggering the â€Å"most rigid scrutiny.† There must be a â€Å"pressing public necessity† for the classification. Here, it was impossible to segregate out the loyal from the disloyal persons, so exclusion of the whole class was justified due to the public dangers involved. The Congress has given the power to the military to make these military based decisions. They are not based on racism. 7. Dissent Reasoning: [Murphy] Contended the the racial classification was not even rationally related to the end of protecting from invasion because it was over inclusive. It is an unreasonable assumption that all persons of Japanese ancestry have the capacity to engage in espionage. The Army had the more effective alternative, which would accord with due process, to hold individual loyalty hearings to determine who was a risk. [Jackson] felt that the decision was even more onerous. A military commander may breach the constitution temporarily every now and then, but for the Supreme Court to rationalize it is to make racism part of the Constitutional doctrine, ready to be used in the future by anyone who can show military expediency.... Free Essays on Legal Brief- Korematsu Free Essays on Legal Brief- Korematsu 1. Korematsu v. United States, (1944); pg. 638, briefed 1/23/96 2. Facts: Shortly after the bombing of Pearl Harbor, the president issued an order allowing the military commanders to exclude persons of Japanese ancestry from areas identified as military areas. 3. Procedural Posture: Korematsu was convicted of violating the exclusionary laws. 4. Issue: Whether classification and exclusion based on Japanese ancestry during the WWII was a violation of equal protection. 5. Holding: No. 6. Majority Reasoning: All legal restrictions that curtail the civil rights of a single racial group are immediately suspect, triggering the â€Å"most rigid scrutiny.† There must be a â€Å"pressing public necessity† for the classification. Here, it was impossible to segregate out the loyal from the disloyal persons, so exclusion of the whole class was justified due to the public dangers involved. The Congress has given the power to the military to make these military based decisions. They are not based on racism. 7. Dissent Reasoning: [Murphy] Contended the the racial classification was not even rationally related to the end of protecting from invasion because it was over inclusive. It is an unreasonable assumption that all persons of Japanese ancestry have the capacity to engage in espionage. The Army had the more effective alternative, which would accord with due process, to hold individual loyalty hearings to determine who was a risk. [Jackson] felt that the decision was even more onerous. A military commander may breach the constitution temporarily every now and then, but for the Supreme Court to rationalize it is to make racism part of the Constitutional doctrine, ready to be used in the future by anyone who can show military expediency....

Renchong.Li's Personal Statement for Postgraduate Application

Renchong.Li's for Postgraduate Application - Personal Statement Example always been one of my ambitions, which has driven me to apply for a chance of pursuing a postgraduate degree in Money, Banking and Finance in your institution. My request for a chance to pursue a master’s programme in Money, Banking and Finance is not based on a desire for a title of a master programme graduate, but rather on my zeal to delve into Finance thus actualizing my career objectives. In effect, this programme would equip me with profession-related skills that would aid me in various systems-level decisions on issues pertaining to Finance. It would also benefit me in the development and creative utilization of computational and analytical techniques for solving financial-related problems, over and above gaining the broader skills, knowledge and background essential in becoming efficient in my profession, particularly in the modern-day rapidly changing global economy. My academic background has immensely equipped me with invaluable fundamental knowledge, which will be of great assistance on my enrolment for this programme. I possess a Bachelor of Commerce Degree in Finance, which is perhaps the primary strongest facet of my application. I have a good studying ability – my Grade Point Average is above 3.0. This is a clear indication that I have a sharp mind that is able to organize reason as well as other complex facts in a precise order for good results in Finance. I am also a resourceful and dynamic person with interpersonal and negotiation skills, an approachable and sociable person, one who is open minded and excellent in networking in addition to being an excellent team player. I believe that over and above increasing my knowledge in Finance, pursuing a postgraduate degree in Money, Banking and Finance would give me the chance of sharpening these skills further. Moreover, my attribute of keeping myself updated by reading magazines, par ticularly business-related ones, enables me to explore diverse business ventures, boost my interest in Finance